Google Eyes by Blue Fountain Media is a plugin for Google’s Chrome web browser that allows users to quickly pull up the Google Cached Text-Only version of nearly any website. This is an excellent way to view a website through Google’s eyes.

One cool use is to quickly and easily check the raw structure and layout of a page and see how well it’s header tags are optimized.

Once installed, a “T” (as in “Text-Only”) icon will appear on the right-hand side of your address bar. To activate Google Eyes, visit the site you want to look up and click the “T” button.

[DOWNLOAD]

Frequently Asked Questions

Why do I get a “We’re Sorry…” page from Google when I try to use Google Eyes?

Google Eyes has to interact with Google’s server to load the Text Only version of the page. When Google’s system detects too much activity from your computer or network, it might appear that the use is automated. Try waiting a while and then using Google Eyes again. To prevent the “We’re sorry” page from coming up in the future, try using Google Eyes less frequently.

Can I suggest a new feature?

Yes! The Blue Fountain Media team is always open to new ideas and ways to improve our plugins. If you have any suggestions or feature requests, please leave them in the comments.

Walkthrough Video

Here’s a YouTube walkthrough of Google Eyes in action

In an email to Google Apps administrators, Google announced that they will begin phasing out support for the old, outdated Internet Explorer 6

On March 1, 2010 they will drop support for IE 6 in Google Docs. Later in the year, gMail and gCal will also drop support for the outdated browser. Web developers will surely celebrate today as the day the internet was saved from the evils of IE 6. The email is reproduced below:

Dear Google Apps admin,​

In order to continue to improve our products and deliver more sophisticated features and performance, we are harnessing some of the latest improvements in web browser technology. This includes faster JavaScript processing and new standards like HTML5. As a result, over the course of 2010, we will be phasing out support for Microsoft Internet Explorer 6.0 as well as other older browsers that are not supported by their own manufacturers.

We plan to begin phasing out support of these older browsers on the Google Docs suite and the Google Sites editor on March 1, 2010. After that point, certain functionality within these applications may have higher latency and may not work correctly in these older browsers. Later in 2010, we will start to phase out support for these browsers for Google Mail and Google Calendar.

Google Apps will continue to support Internet Explorer 7.0 and above, Firefox 3.0 and above, Google Chrome 4.0 and above, and Safari 3.0 and above.

Starting next week, users on these older browsers will see a message in Google Docs and the Google Sites editor explaining this change and asking them to upgrade their browser. We will also alert you again closer to March 1 to remind you of this change.

In 2009, the Google Apps team delivered more than 100 improvements to enhance your product experience. We are aiming to beat that in 2010 and continue to deliver the best and most innovative collaboration products for businesses.

Thank you for your continued support!

Sincerely,

The Google Apps team

There’s been a lot of speculation about Google Caffeine. When will it launch? What will change? What will happen to my results?

The speculation needs to stop. Caffeine is almost certainly live right now—the next query you type into Google will probably reflect Caffeine’s changes.

Google claims that the Caffeine update is about “under the hood” changes to the architecture of the search engine. As Google Engineer Matt Cutts explains, Caffeine is an attempt at “rewriting the foundation of some of our infrastructure.” Though, he goes on to admit that “some of the search results do change.”

But does this minor “under the hood” tweak really update Google to where it needs to be?

Google regularly tweaks and updates their search engine. But Google announced a sort of “cease fire” over the holiday period, where they held back any changes to the search engine. This was to avoid further stressing webmasters during the busy holiday e-commerce season, as happened in 2003.

Caffeine Probably Already Went Live

So Google Caffeine was set to be launched sometime after the holidays. Well, it’s nearly three weeks after the holidays and we haven’t seen much. Perhaps Caffeine has already launched. Google doesn’t usually give advanced previews of their products before they’re released, but that’s what they did with Caffeine. Perhaps they were putting it out there to see if anyone noticed big discrepancies so that they could be corrected and brought more in line with existing Google results. Google has always favored an incremental approach to their products, releasing them and then making tweaks over a long period of time. They don’t like to make major updates all at once. Just look at the development process behind gMail (which was in Beta for years).

If it hasn’t gone live yet, it will soon. And when it does, don’t expect too much to happen.

More Important Than Caffeine: New Realities on the Web

So, Google Caffeine may have already launched. But that’s not what really matters. What matters are the changes that Google has made and will continue to make over the next few weeks and months. Google is moving from results based on frequent updates to results that are live. This is a huge undertaking, and is likely a large part of the reason that Google has had to implement Caffeine.

NoFollow Isn’t What It Used To Be

The idea that NoFollow links don’t influence the target’s ranking in Google (and other search engines) is laughable. Google has built it’s reputation on serving up the best search results. And being the best means returning the most relevant results. Twitter is the proof: Links shared in twitter are NoFollow. But that doesn’t stop Google from displaying them near the very top of their search engine.

Google invented NoFollow as a way to help prevent spam. But the web has gone overboard and NoFollow is on the brink of irrelevance. As more and more of the links on the web become NoFollow, Google has been forced to figure out some sort of way to count these links. One innovation might be follower ratio: Google may be looking at your social graph as a way to weigh your links. For example, Google might be giving more weight to links in tweets from users who have more followers or users who have a better follower to following ratio.

A large portion of the web’s conversation is taking place on Twitter. Simply put: Google cannot afford to ignore links on Twitter.

Bigger Changes

Caffeine is about the underlying system. There are more important changes that will affect the front end.

Site Speed

Google is going to start taking into account how fast pages load. Just look at this video interview with Google’s Matt Cutts. Google will start taking site loading time into account in search rankings. Of course, Google’s top priority will remain returning the most relevant results for the user. But the very soon, Google will give a little bit of an edge to sites that load quickly and a slight penalization to sites that load slowly.

To help the web prepare for this, Google offers a tool to help analyze your site speed. There’s also Google’s Closure Tool to help you optimize your JavaScript. Matt Cutts also recommends checking out webpagetest.org

Fresh Content Bias

Time moves faster on the internet. While Google includes a OneBox for breaking news and relevant Tweets, there is a clear need to more thoroughly integrate fresh content into Google results. In the future, Google will certainly be giving a bump to new articles. Instead of relevancy and importance being the big factors in who ranks, it will probably become a trinity of relevancy, importance, and freshness. Think of how many times you’ve researched a topic only to find that the top result is an outdated article or blog post that is virtually useless. Caffeine fixes that.

Next time you use Google, take a second look at the results: are they timely? Are they relevant? Are they weighting the conversation, as well as the link-graph?

In other words: are they caffeinated?